Blog

Conservative Lead Over Labour Has Dropped 16 points In a Month – What’s Going On?

Corbyn Campaign Cuts Conservative Lead To Just One Point, Only Half of Public Now Believe Theresa May Would Be Best PM.

 

Headline voting intention results (change since May 30th)

 

CON 42% (-2); LAB 40% (+3); LD 6% (-3); UKIP 3% (-1); Others 9% (+2)

Conservative lead over Labour = 1.2% Unrounded CON 41.6% LAB 40.4%

 

Methodology: Survation interviewed 1,103 UK residents aged 18+ using a combination of demographically pre-balanced mobile and landline data, conducting fieldwork 2nd – 3rd June.

 

Conservative Lead Over Labour Has Dropped 16 points In a Month

 

9th May15th May22nd May30th May5th June
CON46.8%47.8%43.3%43.1%41.50%
LAB30.2%29.7%34.3%37.3%40.40%
CON Lead16.6%18.1%9.0%5.8%1.1%

 

  • The strong Conservative lead over Labour, which was a high as 18 points in the second poll in our series for Good Morning Britain has shrunk to just one point in the fifth and final update.

 

  • Only half of those polled (50%) now believe Theresa May would make a better Prime Minister than Jeremy Corbyn (36%) who has seen his best PM rating increase by 15 points over the course of the series, Theresa May’s has dropped by 10 points.

 

Are Labour’s Hopes Dependent On An Unrealistic Turnout Expectation of Young Voters? – Damian Lyons Lowe

Survation have not changed the way we take turnout into consideration in our telephone or online polling, full details of any changes we have made, and the track record of our telephone polling method can be found here:

Most of the polling industry however, in response to our shared “neck and neck” error – for us only in our online method – have introduced various new turnout adjustments which have the effect of up weighting their Conservative voting intention figures and reducing the weight of groups and voters that they believe are exaggerating their likelihood to Labour and skewing headline data. Patrick Sturgis and Will Jennings discuss these changes here:

But are these changes, applied to a new election, 2 years later under very different circumstances muting the “true” picture in 2017?

What effect is self declared turnout having on Survation’s figures?

Most of the comments we receive on our GMB polls that have posted steep declines in the Tory lead in three successive weeks have pointed to a subgroup of young people who declare an intention to vote (turnout) bordering on double that which some post-election studies found was the reality in 2015.

The effect of an exaggerated turnout, (most conspicuous among the youngest who are traditionally the least likely to vote – the “18-24” category) however is neutral to the CON/LAB position as all age categories in our polling claim a higher likelihood to vote than reality – a common social desirability phenomenon.

After normal weighting, but before any self declared turnout adjustment of our figures, the state of the two parties was:

=> Conservative 41.4, Labour 40.1% – a lead of 1.3% – much the same as the headline figures.

A further exercise could be undertaken to address concerns of exaggerated self-declared turnout among the young being the “culprit’ of the apparent disappearance of the Tory lead.

Performance of a “harsh” adjustment – assuming turnout by age for all age categories is no better than that found by Ipsos Mori in it’s 2015 review of how different age groups registered to vote did or did not vote.

Among the age groups, use of these targets, and ignoring the stated intention to vote altogether would take 18-24 voters to just a 43% turnout and only just over half – 54% of the next youngest – the 25-34 category would show up at the polls.

=> Conservative 42.49, Labour 38.64 – a Conservative lead of 3.86

2016 EU Referendum?

If we were to again entirely ignore self-declared turnout by age for all age categories and use targets from a more recent example – the 2016 EU Referendum our figures would be:

Conservative 41.85, Labour 39.43 – a Conservative lead of 2.42

But how will younger voters split by party and how many are registered vs 2015 and 2016?

The above assumptions were performed on our weighted data, which this week produced a unusual voting intention boost among the 18-24s vs the unweighted data for the Conservative – which we will put into context.

Survation 18-24s split this week

51% Labour, 39% Conservative.

Last week’s data had an 18-24 split of

60% Labour, 27% Conservative

For reference, a large sample recent ICM poll with a focus on younger voters found 63 per cent of  the 1002 18-24-year-olds polled said they were “absolutely certain” to vote – higher than both the above estimates for turnout above.  

Of those planning to vote, a higher figure than we see above among these small sub-samples – 67 per cent – said they would back Labour, compared with just 16 per cent for the Conservatives and eight per cent for the Liberal Democrats. The Greens and SNP were both on three per cent, with UKIP and Plaid Cymru on one per cent each.

Voter Registration

The reason I describe using 2015 turnout assumptions as “harsh” is that there is some evidence the younger voters will play a more crucial and active role in this election – one in which Labour have a “retail” offer to younger voters – new university students will be freed from paying £9,000 in tuition fees as early as this autumn if Labour wins the election. Students who are partway through their courses would no longer have to pay tuition fees from 2018, meaning those starting their final year of study in September would be the last cohort liable for the £27,000 of debts to be paid back when graduates pass an earnings threshold.

Official Data

Beyond ICM’s 63% certainty figure, among under 25s the UK government’s official data from the Electoral Commission, shows new registrations to vote in the 2 month period prior to the deadline among 18-24s up 33% vs 2015 and for 25-34s up 13%.

Registrations for the two youngest groups were up +422,688.  All other age groups saw registration declines vs 2015 in the comparable period at -236,789.

Registration to vote by age group, over a two month period before the deadline

 

Under 2525-3435-4445-5455-6465-7475+
2015 GE

 

875905100981257832139784422389612029167669
2016 EU Ref

 

1006641127019475035254341829649814861857045
2017 GE

 

116601511423905283883063111752939605945181
Difference between 2017 and 2015

 

290110132578-49933-91533-48603-24232-22488
% change 2017 vs. 2015

 

33.12%13.13%-8.63%-23.01%-21.71%-20.14%-33.23%
Difference between 2017 and 2016

 

159374-127804-221964-237107-121205-52559-11864
% change 2017 vs. 2016 EU Ref

 

15.83%-10.06%-29.58%-43.63%-40.88%-35.37%-20.80%

Perceptions of the Campaign

Elsewhere in the polling, the public mood about aspects of the campaign were clear.

  • Three-quarters of those we interviewed do not believe that Theresa May will achieve her pledge to reduce net migration to the tens of thousands, including 29% of current Conservative voters.

 

  • More than half of  (51%), regardless of their intention to vote, think that Labour have had the best campaign, including just under a third of current Conservative voters (30%) and undecided voters (31%). This compares to just 23% who think that the Conservatives have had the best campaign.

 

  • Similarly, more than half (52%), told Survation that regardless of their intention to vote, they think that Jeremy Corbyn has had the best campaign, including just under a third of current Conservative voters (30%) and almost half of undecided voters (45%), compared to just over a quarter (27%) who said Theresa May.

Expectations and Coalitions

  • Nearly two-thirds (66%) of people think that a Conservative majority of some description is the most likely outcome of this election, although around two-thirds of those think it will be ‘small’.

 

  • While the public were generally split over whether they approve or disapprove of the possible government formations listed if there was no overall majority, people would rather one of the main parties governed alone as a minority government rather than forming a coalition.

 

  • 46% and 43% approve of a Conservative minority government or a Labour minority government respectively, compared to less than a third who approve of either a CON / LD coalition (32%) or a LAB / SNP / LD coalition (31%).

I’d welcome your feedback on this summary, which was put together by Survation’s Tom Bristow and Chris Hopkins with some assistance and guidance from The Electoral Commission and former BBC research head David Cowling.

Damian Lyons Lowe.

Full data tables for all questions, including the 7 category age group details can be viewed here

 

Survation will be conducting General Election voting intention polls up to and on the day the UK goes to the polls. For more information, please contact chris.hopkins@survation.com or call 0203 818 9661.


To find out more about Survation’s services, and how you can conduct a telephone or online poll for your research needs, please visit our services page.

About Survation 

Survation conduct telephone, online and in-person market research, as well as strategy & advisory research for well-known brands & organisations. Survation are members of the British Polling Council.

You can sign up other email addresses or colleagues to our press release list here.

Follow Survation on Twitter:
@Survation – Our Main Account
@DamianSurvation – Personal commentary from our Chief Executive

More about the services Survation provide can be found here. For press enquiries, please call 0203 818 9661 or email enquiry@survation.com

Survation Ltd Registered in England & Wales Number 07143509

Damian Lyons Lowe

Damian Lyons Lowe

Founder & CEO

More Posts - Website

Follow Me:
TwitterLinkedIn


< Back
Back to Top